Alexander vs porus
![alexander vs porus alexander vs porus](https://apnaorg.com/prose-content/english-articles/page-46/article-4/pictures/image002.jpg)
#ALEXANDER VS PORUS FULL#
But then so was Abu’l Fazl’s ‘Ain-e-Akbari’ full of propaganda. Earlier in the Soviet-era, Russian researchers decimated Greek historians for producing ‘propaganda and lies’. Of late a lot of new research on Alexander and his invasion of the Indian sub-continent has been produced by Harvard University scholars. No wonder the amazing Punjab Archives continue to lie in a stinking horse stable. The West rules because it collects, preserves, respects and shares knowledge. Mubarak Ali correctly pointed out that researching in Lahore was impossible because though we do have a few respectable collections, access to them is impossible. In an article in this newspaper last Sunday, Dr.
![alexander vs porus alexander vs porus](https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/Alexander-of-Macedonia-1-e1594640536698-1200x350-c-default.jpg)
Harmatta of Budapest’s Akademiai Kiado, titled: ‘From Herataeus to Al-Huwarizmi’. It had always puzzled me, even as a schoolboy, just why did Alexander ‘the conqueror’ avoid coming to Lahore when we all know that he proceeded beyond? ‘So unfair’ I remember telling my father, who in his relaxed manner commented: “The bugger was a defeated invader who did not deserve to see Lahore.” But the central question remained embedded in my mind, portions of which were answered when I recently read a book edited by J. It is essential that the history of Lahore be studied by avoiding communal loyalties which rule present-day academic Pakistan. He had good reason as new research tells us. As a researcher on the history of Lahore, my interest has remained focused on why Alexander avoided, or better still deliberately bypassed, Lahore. Simha, and even Nawotka, are convinced that Porus ended up the victor. The answer surely lies in the warped manner in which history is written, and people love those who claim to have won.īut then times are changing, for over the last many years scholars of ancient history of Punjab, using the texts of ancient historians like Herodotus, Hecataeus, Scylax and Plutarch, and relatively newer ones like Hammond, Borza, R.K. The result is an analysis of Alexander history and myth, a vivid account of numismatics, and a fascinating look into the age-old mechanics of megalomania.My childhood friend ‘Tipu’ Almakky always had this grudge about why people prefer to name their children Sikander but never Porus, a true Punjabi hero. The book considers the history of their discovery and interpretation, the knowable facts of their manufacture and meaning, and, ultimately, the king's own psyche and his frightening theology of war. Recovered from Afghanistan and Iraq in sensational and sometimes perilous circumstances, these ancient artifacts have long animated the modern historical debate about Alexander.
![alexander vs porus alexander vs porus](https://www.wga.hu/art/b/berchem/battle1.jpg)
#ALEXANDER VS PORUS SERIES#
Solid evidence for the “supernaturalized” Alexander lies in a rare series of medallions that depict the triumphant young king at war against the elephants, archers, and chariots of Rajah Porus of India at the Battle of the Hydaspes River. How Alexander himself promoted this appearance-how he abetted the belief that he enjoyed divine favor and commanded even the forces of nature against his enemies-is the subject of this book. To all those who witnessed his extraordinary conquests, from Albania to India, Alexander the Great appeared invincible. Recovered from Afghanistan and Iraq in sensational.